It seems that LEGO rip-off company Lepin has now set their eyes on the LEGO building community as its next victim of copyright infringement. Recently, images of yet another fake LEGO monstrosity have surfaced over the Internet, and to the horror and dismay of our highly talented adult LEGO builders, it was discovered that Lepin irreverently copied all of the designs of its next diabolical offerings from certain LEGO Ideas projects that were submitted in 2013 and 2014.
The above picture on the left was apparently taken from the original ideas of wooootles over at LEGO Ideas with his modular build, Barnes & Nobles and Starbucks Store. The one on the right is from Jme Wheeler’s L. Rivendell Museum of Natural History. Take a look at the images of these original creations and see for yourself how Lepin blatantly copies them without even asking for permission from their respective creators.
Refusing to take the matter sitting down, Jme Wheeler has decided to do something about it and came up with an open letter addressed to the LEGO counterfeit company. Here is his letter in its entirety.
What you’re doing is wrong.
I would think this would be obvious, but clearly that isn’t the case. It’s obvious neither to you, nor is it obvious to your customers. Apparently, both of you feel entitled to other people’s work. You feel that you have a right to copy the designs of others, and that because there is a demand in the marketplace, you have a right to fulfill it. I want this to be very clear – you don’t.
For years now, you have been stealing the LEGO Group’s products. I’m not simply talking about producing building bricks. You are free to do so, and if you did so responsibly, there would be no problem. You steal their branding, their designs, IP, and advertising. You do everything you can to look like a legitimate LEGO product.
As a company, Lepin, you take it upon yourself to provide copies of LEGO sets at a cheaper price. Your customers see this as a good thing. It means they can get current, or even retired sets for much less than the asking price, which in their eyes is ‘too high’. That difference in cost is facilitated by your moral bankruptcy. Of course you can provide a cheaper version when you pay not for the licensing, design, branding, marketing, nor research.
I agree that aftermarket prices for retired LEGO sets are more often than not completely ridiculous. That isn’t the LEGO Group’s fault. That is the fault of opportunists, not so different from yourself, preying on those who were unable to purchase a set when it was available. I also understand that there is still a demand for these sets. The LEGO Group has no responsibility to keep sets in production in perpetuity, or to re-release old sets. Would it be great if they did? Absolutely. Are they obligated to, simply to satisfy rabid consumerism? Absolutely not.
The vileness of your practices is only getting worse, as you’ve now decided it isn’t enough to steal from another company. You’ve decided to apply your brand of thievery to the LEGO community at large. I recently read about a Lepin ‘CREATORS’ set, which is an exact copy of the ‘Barnes & Noble and Starbucks Store’ Ideas submission by wooootles. I was disgusted. How could someone even consider doing such a thing? Also shown was the back of the box, and there were many more stolen designs, including my ‘L. Rivendell Museum of Natural History’. My heart dropped into my stomach. I couldn’t believe it. There I was, looking at a build I had spent over a month on, being produced by a bootleg toy company. Someone else had taken my design, without my permission, and is selling it for a profit. You. You did that.
This type of theft doesn’t just hurt TLG, or individual builders like myself and the others you’ve wronged. It hurts the building community as a whole. There are so many amazing builders out there. There are so many people out there creating beautiful, inventive, funny, and surprising things. I’ve met a lot of really tremendous people through my experiences with LEGO. I’ve been given an incredible chance to interact with other builders through Blocks magazine, as well as at conventions or with my LUG. I even met the love of my life through this hobby. All of those opportunities only existed because there is a vibrant community of people sharing their work with each other.
If you continue to steal people’s art, to capitalize on their hard work and ingenuity, then eventually people will stop sharing their work. People will cease to be inspired by one another. An incredible community would be destroyed. Without creative people and their ideas, there is nothing for you to steal. There is nothing for your customers to consume.
You clearly see value in what the LEGO Group, and builders like me bring into the world. Curiously though, you seem to see no value in we who make it possible. You could have contacted any of us, we’re not hard to find. You certainly found our work. You could have offered to license our designs (though I still would have declined because your business practices are utterly reprehensible). You could be a legitimate company. Instead, you choose to simply build your fortune on the work of those around you. It is both lazy and deplorable, and I sincerely hope one day karma catches up with you.
It’s about time that someone finally stood up against the illegal activities of Lepin and other counterfeit LEGO manufacturers. True, it may be a long and hard battle, but it is worth it. Thanks to Brickset and Brick Fanatics for bringing this up.
One thought on “LEGO Rip-off Lepin Now Copying LEGO Ideas Projects – AFOL Angrily Speaks Up.”
No comments? Wow. Lots of people are buying these sets. Who’s at fault? The bootleg company who are blatantly ripping off ideas or the people who buy (and condone) these products?
Should Lepin go to court? Should people who buy these sets be prosecuted?
I understand that many people are tempted to buy a desirable set that’s just not made anymore for half the price. What’s even harder for LEGO fans is that these products are of very good quality from what I have watched on YouTube.
It is sad that people are getting their work stolen. That’s the crappy part. I’m almost certain none of this is worth a pigeon fart to LEGO, however. Being copied means you’re the best. Being the best comes with profit and desirability. In the end I don’t think LEGO is going to suffer- it’s those that missed out on a contract with LEGO and are now getting ripped off by thieves.
Have I been tempted. Yes. Have I bought any LEPIN sets? No. It certainly would be interesting to see the build quality however even for comparison sake.